Comments on: The Stadium of the Future http://archive.mensjournal.com/the-stadium-of-the-future Sat, 18 May 2013 03:03:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: sofia http://archive.mensjournal.com/the-stadium-of-the-future#comment-14584 sofia Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:35:32 +0000 http://www.mensjournal.com/?p=8319#comment-14584 wow! really eye catching design. i wish i can go there & enjoy some sports when it'll finished it;s work. wow! really eye catching design. i wish i can go there & enjoy some sports when it’ll finished it;s work.

]]> By: John http://archive.mensjournal.com/the-stadium-of-the-future#comment-6807 John Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:08:40 +0000 http://www.mensjournal.com/?p=8319#comment-6807 It's probably because the architect hooked up Men's Journal with the renderings for free. To get quality aerials, MJ would have probably had to go through local media, the Associated Press or maybe even the Cowboys. Local media and the AP would charge for use of their photos (the AP charges a TON for use of their stuff if you're not a member), and quite frankly dealing with NFL teams is a pain. It’s probably because the architect hooked up Men’s Journal with the renderings for free. To get quality aerials, MJ would have probably had to go through local media, the Associated Press or maybe even the Cowboys. Local media and the AP would charge for use of their photos (the AP charges a TON for use of their stuff if you’re not a member), and quite frankly dealing with NFL teams is a pain.

]]> By: Michael http://archive.mensjournal.com/the-stadium-of-the-future#comment-6805 Michael Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:29:57 +0000 http://www.mensjournal.com/?p=8319#comment-6805 I'm surprised you're using architectural renderings for this article - the stadium's been in use for months now. Then again, $500 for a "cheap" Cowboys ticket is probably hard to explain to the IRS. I’m surprised you’re using architectural renderings for this article – the stadium’s been in use for months now.

Then again, $500 for a “cheap” Cowboys ticket is probably hard to explain to the IRS.

]]>